
Well folks, every summer the bees lazily churn their wings for honey, every fall the trees shed their leaves to dance with the winter wind, every winter Christmas lights mimic icicles, and every spring I start anew. It is a beautiful time of rebirth.
I truly feel as if it were my springtime, where life has a deep and flowing purpose, and the love of the Lord abounds like a well-spring in my heart. Several miracles have been in the works, and this little abstract is one of them.
Efficiency of Interfacial Heat and Mass Transfer
There has been both historic and recent excitement in literature concerning the evaporation (ηev) and condensation (ηcond) coefficients and their application to mass transfer at liquid-vapor interfaces. Classically defined in the Hertz-Knudsen- Schrage equation [1], ηev and ηcond represent the molecular emission efficiency from a liquid surface and the accommodation efficiency of an impinging molecule onto a liquid surface. Studies have been conducted which make no separation between these efficiencies, assuming their affects non-distinct or their numerical values synonymous. Other authors define an uptake coefficient (γmeas) as being similar to ηev, but including solubility constraints as the liquid species approaches Henry’s law saturation [2]. These definitions of mass transfer efficiencies have numerous application in literature, i.e. experimentation on the uptake of gases by aqueous surfaces [3,4].
The thermal analog of the evaporation coefficient is the thermal (energy) accommodation coefficient (ηtherm), defined as the efficiency of heat transfer per molecular collision with the interface. A stream of molecules with velocity modeled by a Maxwellian distribution impinges on a liquid surface with a representative bulk temperature. Complete accommodation would result in a ηtherm of unity, where reflected molecules would impart a portion of their energy to the interface, resulting in a ηtherm ranging from zero up to unity.
This paper presents a study that incorporates the evaporation, condensation, and thermal accommodation coefficients into an analytic model which predicts mass and heat fluxes as functions of particle and bulk vapor temperatures. The solution for a constant-diameter water droplet undergoing steady state vaporization while suspended in a quiescent, dry nitrogen environment is elucidated.
[1] R. Schrage, A Theoretical Study of Interphase Mass Transfer. Columbia University Press, New York, 1953
[2] Q. Shi, Y. Q. Li, P. Davidovits. Isotope Exchange for Gas-Phase Acetic Acid and Ethanol at Aqueous Interfaces: A Study of Surface Reactions. J. Phys. Chem. B., 103: 2417-2430, 1999
[3] J. T. Jayne, P. Davidovits. Uptake of SO2 (g) by Aqueous Surfaces as a Function of pH: The Effect of Chemical Reaction at the Interface. J. Phys. Chem. 94(6041-6048), 1990
[4] James A. Gardner, Lyn R. Watson, Mark A. Zahniser. Measurement of the Mass Accommodation Coefficient of SO2 (g) on Water Droplets. J. Geophys. Res. 92(D9), 10, 887-10, 95, 2010
2 comments:
Yay Chelise! It will be fabulous!
Chelise, this is so incredibly exciting!! I have the biggest smile on my face. I will admit that I got kind of lost because you are just so smart, but I know that this is a big deal :). I too love the new sunshine and buds and green leaves that pop out during Springtime. It inspires me to re-evaluate my life and start anew too! Love you.
Post a Comment